K, Ki, are scaling factors, therefore I would call that type of formatting 
scaled format. I expect most people would understand what I meant.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Charles Mills
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 1:24 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: OT - What is the proper term for "K" notation?
> 
> No, no one is answering the question I tried to ask. Sorry if I was unclear.
> 
> I am NOT asking "what is the difference between kilo and kibi?" or "is it 
> right
> to refer to 1024 as 1K?" or anything like that.
> 
> I am asking what you CALL that KIND of notation.
> 
> If my program outputs numbers as 1234 and 4560000 but your program
> outputs the same values as 1.234K and 4.56M, what would you call the
> *format* that your program uses? Your program outputs numbers in ______
> notation. Mine OTOH outputs numbers in _____ notation.
> 
> Perhaps "powers of 1000 notation." Any term more compact than that that
> could be used as a control statement option?
> 
> Charles
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 12:21 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: OT - What is the proper term for "K" notation?
> 
> Charles Mills wrote:
> 
> >...ultra-precise word jockeys here.
> 
> ...have already discussed 1001 times on IBM-MAIN and posted/refered in
> IBM-MAIN this:
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefix#IEC_standard_prefixes
> 
> There you will learn about kibi and friends.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to