Hi Michael,
You said: "...CICS is to IMS as Windows 3.1 is to Windows 10. ..."
You're comparing apples and oranges.
(CICS has no native Database portion.)
BTW, a lot of the banks, insurance companies etc. are running CICS+DB2.
The majority of IMS users need it to support 40+ year old application systems.
Which one is the real dinosaur? (Hint: It's not CICS)

Regards,
David

On 2023-07-25 10:37, Schmitt, Michael wrote:
So CICS is no longer doing cooperative multitasking within each AOR, and thus 
requiring CICS versions of OS commands to prevent wait states from freezing the 
entire AOR? A CICS program can do direct GETMAINs, LOADS, abends, rather than 
use CICS commands? CICS no longer requires special versions of tools (e.g. 
debugger, abend dump management) and instead can use the same tools as batch 
programs? A CICS programmer no longer needs to learn a long list of CICS 
commands and EXEC CICS syntax? A CICS region no longer contains the storage 
from all of the transactions currently running and is now only one transaction 
in the region at a time? CICS transactions can no longer stomp on each other's 
memory?

Great, I did not know that.

IMS/TM uses the operating system for multitasking. There are no IMS/TM specific 
tools. An IMS/TM programmer only needs to know two commands, one to get a 
message and another to send it. IMS transaction abends look (almost) exactly 
like a batch abend. IMS programs have no restrictions on OS facilities. An IMS 
program can even do an STIMER (WAIT) without affecting any other transaction 
processing. Because, it uses the OS to do *preemptive* multitasking, like a 
modern operating system.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of 
Crawford Robert C (Contractor)
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2023 8:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXT] Ars Technica: The IBM mainframe: How it runs and why it 
survives

Sorry, I worked in a shop that had both and I can tell you CICS is way more 
flexible, modern and performed better.

I will give you this:  IMS is a great piece of 90's technology.

Robert Crawford
Abstract Evolutions LLC
(210) 913-3822

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of 
Schmitt, Michael
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2023 11:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXT] Ars Technica: The IBM mainframe: How it runs and why it survives

Ars Technica published a deep-dive explainer of modern IBM mainframes:

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/07/the-ibm-mainframe-how-it-runs-and-why-it-survives/


Iā€™d quibble with the application server topic that talks about CICS with no 
mention of IMS/TM. CICS is to IMS as Windows 3.1 is to Windows 10.  šŸ˜Š



----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to