On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 17:08:09 +0000, Gibney, Dave wrote:

>In 1978, the class in PDP assembler used ed. Didn't mention vi. 
>Discovering vi was quite helpful to my progress in the class.
>
Mavens have cautioned me that I should master ed lest I am ever
confined to a terminal lacking the capabilities needed by vi.
I've ignored them, so far.

3278?

But ed : vi :: TSO EDIT : ISPF.

PDP?  ed, not TECO?

-- 
gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to