LINK and SYMLINK are for alternate names.
________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of
Phil Smith III <li...@akphs.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 1:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SMP/E and USS
Consider this from an SMPMCS:
++HFS(dddddddd) DISTLIB(lllllll)
SYSLIB(sssssss)
BINARY
LINK('lib/libdddddddd.a')
PARM(PATHMODE(0,6,4,4))
RELFILE(5) .
That creates, in the directory specified on the DDDEF for sssssss, file
dddddddd; and in the lib\ directory under that, libdddddddd.a.
These files are identical. I don't need the dddddddd for linking etc.; do I
need it for later service or something? If it's not required, why did SMP/E
leave it there?
Reading the doc found very little about this. It's not a huge deal, just kinda
ugly, UNLESS it's required for some reason. Yes, I could us SHSCRIPT to run a
script to delete it, but that seems unlikely to be necessary just to remove
cruft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
