LINK and SYMLINK are for alternate names. ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of Phil Smith III <li...@akphs.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 1:04 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: SMP/E and USS
Consider this from an SMPMCS: ++HFS(dddddddd) DISTLIB(lllllll) SYSLIB(sssssss) BINARY LINK('lib/libdddddddd.a') PARM(PATHMODE(0,6,4,4)) RELFILE(5) . That creates, in the directory specified on the DDDEF for sssssss, file dddddddd; and in the lib\ directory under that, libdddddddd.a. These files are identical. I don't need the dddddddd for linking etc.; do I need it for later service or something? If it's not required, why did SMP/E leave it there? Reading the doc found very little about this. It's not a huge deal, just kinda ugly, UNLESS it's required for some reason. Yes, I could us SHSCRIPT to run a script to delete it, but that seems unlikely to be necessary just to remove cruft. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN