I think we’re swerving off-topic from z/OS technical content.

Matt Hogstrom
m...@hogstrom.org
+1-919-656-0564
PGP Key: 0x90ECB270
Facebook <https://facebook.com/matt.hogstrom>  LinkedIn 
<https://linkedin/in/mhogstrom>  Twitter <https://twitter.com/hogstrom>

“It may be cognitive, but, it ain’t intuitive."
— Hogstrom

> On Dec 2, 2023, at 15:30, Bob Bridges <robhbrid...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Can't speak for anyone else, but I usually just take (or turn down) the first 
> offer, mostly I think out of poor self-image.  Not sure why, because I don't 
> mind dickering over a car.
> 
> The only exception I can remember off-hand is when a consulting company that 
> employed me was looking to cut costs, and asked that I go independent and 
> start invoicing them rather than being a W-2.  They offered me the same rate 
> I'd been making as an employee, which wasn't going to work for me if they 
> stopped paying me for bench time.  But mostly I say "$65/hr?  Yeah, I can do 
> that".  Shameful, I know.
> 
> This, by the way, is one of those differences I had in mind when I said 
> Yankee and Indian recruiters approach the negotiation differently.  American 
> companies have a definite range in mind and aren't usually shy about stating 
> it in the opening email.  (Although I wouldn't be surprised if they give the 
> lower part of the range, knowing they can raise it if they run across a 
> really attractive candidate.)  Indian companies don’t usually state the range 
> up front; instead I see "please send us your resume and your lowest rate...". 
>  Different assumptions about the way the process should work, I suppose.
> 
> ---
> Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
> 
> /* The cure for boredom is curiosity.  There is no cure for curiosity.  
> -Dorothy Parker */
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of 
> Seymour J Metz
> Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2023 13:05
> 
> How many programmers negotiate when a recruiter contacts them with a lowball 
> offer, and how many just move it to the circular file? When I'm looking for 
> people, I don't want to scare away good candidates with an offer that might 
> offend them; I ask "What are you looking for?".
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of 
> Bob Bridges <robhbrid...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2023 12:01 AM
> 
> ....On the other hand maybe it's just a negotiating tactic.  There are 
> several differences in the way Indian and Yankee recruiters approach me (and 
> I assume everyone else too); maybe lowballing is just one of the ways they're 
> used to doing business, with the assumption that they'll have to go higher to 
> actually close the deal.
> 
> ...$125/hr, really?  I should maybe pay more attention to the advice a fellow 
> contractor gave me a couple decades ago.  I was working for ... well, 
> apparently you would regard it as peanuts although it's always been adequate 
> for me.  But Joe said I should demand $250/hr.  I'd work only about a third 
> of the time, but since that's about three times what I typically was getting, 
> it would come out even - and in the slack periods I could work on some 
> saleable project.  I understood what he was saying; I just couldn't find a 
> way to say "$250/hr" with a straight face.
> 
> Maybe that's a common foible.  My ex made really high-end decorated cakes, 
> the sort that we saw going for $150 and up at state fairs; but she couldn't 
> bring herself to ask more for her work than the cost of materials.  She just 
> couldn't believe her work was worth it.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of 
> Tony Harminc
> Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 17:37
> 
> I interpreted Bob's comment "...I think the rate is unusual; I'm guessing 
> they don't think they can get one of their regulars to do it."  as meaning he 
> thought it (60-65 $/hr) was high.
> 
> But I agree that finding someone with serious assembler chops for that price 
> isn't going to be easy. $65/hour sounds much more like an all-in 
> employee-with-benefits kind of rate back-calculated from a salary.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of 
> Farley, Peter
> Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 16:31
> 
> Agreed, very low.  I asked for and received $125/hr back in 1999 for a 
> complex assembler consulting job (BTAM / BDAM / multitasking / etc).   With 
> inflation and time passing the starting rate for that kind of work has to go 
> over $200/hr at the very least to attract anyone with the talent and 
> experience.
> 
> If it is a truly junior position though, say maintaining and perhaps 
> documenting old single-function utility ASM subroutines, that might not be a 
> terrible starting point to negotiate upwards.  Anything more complicated than 
> that, start the negotiation higher, or much higher depending on the actual 
> work to be done.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of 
> Mike Shaw
> Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 16:15
> 
> Gotta be low...
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of 
> Gord Tomlin
> Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 15:24
> 
> --- On 2023-12-01 14:14 PM, Bob Bridges wrote:
> Pure curiosity: unusually low or unusually high?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: robhbrid...@gmail.com <robhbrid...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 14:14
> 
> I have a req here from Enterprise solutions for an assembler programmer, 
> paying "60-65 $/hr" on corp-to-corp.  Anyone wanted a copy, let me know and 
> I'll pass it on.
> 
> I've never done business with this recruiter but I think the rate is unusual; 
> I'm guessing they don't think they can get one of their regulars to do it.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
> lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
> lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to