Thanks all I did was decrement X’128’ > On Jan 8, 2024, at 10:08 PM, Tony Harminc <t...@harminc.net> wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 19:20, Joseph Reichman <reichman...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> After getting an abend with SDWAEC2 (different from SDWAEC1) I observed >> SDWAXFLG to be X'92' that means SDWAEC2 psw came from the linkage stack >> >> Looking at the STCB field STCBLSDP I started going back ward by X'128' a >> linkage stack entry and was unable to find a marching PSW >> >> THANKS >> > > As you were marching backwards through the state entries looking for PSWs, > are you sure you didn't pass a header entry, which is much shorter, and > could point to a state entry in a previous stack section? > > Tony H. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
