>> (That seems to have been an off-list communication; Idon't see it in the >> archives.)
Paul, Yes, it is indeed an offline communication. I just showed the behavior is SAME across different releases as Steve mentioned that he did not have access to 2.4 system anymore. So, from my example, he checked his code and found that Unit parm value has been truncated and he corrected it. >> Did Kolusu explain what syntactic production resulted in UNIT=339? Not really. Resolving a bad value on UNIT parm will depend on OP's ACS routines in place. Thanks, Kolusu ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
