IBM gave us Unix and mvs in one box without the need for dual boot ;-)

*| **Itschak Mugzach | Director | SecuriTeam Software **|** IronSphere
Platform* *|* *Information Security Continuous Monitoring for Z/OS, zLinux
and IBM I **|  *

*|* *Email**: [email protected] **|* *Mob**: +972 522 986404 **|*
*Skype**: ItschakMugzach **|* *Web**: www.Securiteam.co.il  **|*





On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 5:20 PM Steve Beaver <
[email protected]> wrote:

> IBM gave us the MOUSE
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Jay Maynard
> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2025 7:13 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: What has IBM ever done for us? (probably more than I know)
>
> IBM wasn't consistent with PgUp/PgDn, either. The 122-key PC/3270 keyboard
> has the magic 6 (which are above not an inverted T, but a cross, with Home
> in the center) as PA1, PA2/PgUp, and Jump/PgDn (with PA3 on the Alt) across
> the top, then backtab/End, Insert, and Delete.
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 12:40 AM Timothy Sipples <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Steve Thompson wrote:
> > >I'm not sure the mag stripe on a credit card was by IBM. As I
> > >understood it, TeleCredit of Tampa owned that patent as it had
> > >been invented by one of their people.
> >
> > I wrote "Magnetic stripes on payment and other cards (such as ID cards),"
> > i.e. the card itself. Upon further research it still looks historically
> > accurate. Here's IBM's point of view:
> >
> > https://www.ibm.com/history/magnetic-stripe
> >
> > As I understand it, Ron Klein claims he was first to file a *related*
> > patent (in 1966, granted in 1969). His patent is for automating credit
> card
> > validations. He does not claim he invented the magnetic strip/stripe card
> > itself. At least not in this article where he offers his point of view:
> >
> >
> >
> https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/point-sale-pioneer-ron-klein-looks-back-2013-08-13
> >
> > The work the late IBM engineer Forrest Parry and his wife, Dorothea, did
> > (originally for the CIA) dates to 1960 -- prior art about 6 years before
> > Klein filed his patent. Also, IBM did NOT patent its magnetic stripe card
> > technology. (Maybe IBM didn't have a choice?) Which makes IBM's
> > contribution that much more relevant to the "for us?" part of the subject
> > line.
> >
> > Jay Maynard wrote:
> > >1) There aer still a lot of folks who swap left-control and caps lock,
> and
> > >will swear till their dying day that control must always be to the left
> of
> > >A and refuse to consider any other option. They will argue that down low
> > >where it is on basically every modern keyboard is and always will be
> > wrong.
> >
> > Sure, but DEC's CTRL isn't to the left of the A key on the LK201. DEC put
> > the CAPS LOCK key to the immediate left of the A key, then the CTRL key
> to
> > the left of CAPS LOCK. That was a supremely bad arrangement. If you want
> to
> > remap CAPS LOCK to CTRL, of course you can. Just like a fair number of
> > people remap right CTRL to 3270 ENTER. But I think IBM was quite wise in
> > keeping CTRL and CAPS LOCK well separated.
> >
> > While I'm complaining, DEC had the excellent insight to create the
> > "inverted T" layout for the 4 cursor navigation keys but then placed
> "Next
> > Screen" and "Prev Screen" keys *horizontally* and *adjacent* to one
> > another. Ugh. Maybe they had flipping through the pages of a book in
> mind?
> > But at least with the benefit of hindsight I don't think that was the
> best
> > decision. It's inconsistent with the behavior of the inverted T keys, and
> > it doesn't even make sense in terms of the left arrow/right arrow key
> > positions which should be orthogonal. The arrangement of the other keys
> > (and the keys themselves) in their chosen "magic 6" is also hard to
> > understand. Frankly, the LK201's "magic 6" is a complete mess. I think
> IBM
> > got this part right too: Page Up and Page Down arranged vertically. Same
> > with Home and End. IBM's 6 key layout just makes a lot more sense in my
> > view.
> >
> > >4) I'm typing this on a 122-key IBM keyboard with a vertical enter key,
> > and
> > >;'\ are right next to each other to the left of L there, too.
> >
> > Yes, absolutely there were variations. The 122 key layout was reasonably
> > popular for hardcore data entry and in customer call centers, as
> examples.
> > But I'm really focusing on the much more popular 101/102 key PC layout
> that
> > IBM helped spread far and wide because that's the layout that still
> > reverberates, in many good ways. The \ and | keys are important for
> command
> > line work in various operating systems, so on the PC keyboard layout IBM
> > kicked that key above the ENTER key and enlarged it slightly. Good
> > decision, I think.
> >
> > >And yeah, the LK201's touch, not to put too fine a point on it, sucks
> > >rocks.
> >
> > Yeah, and the (configurable) speaker clicks to simulate the sound of
> > mechanical keystrokes somehow made the whole experience even worse. :-(
> > However, the smooth scrolling feature was mildly entertaining for about
> 10
> > minutes. :-)
> >
> > —————
> > Timothy Sipples
> > Senior Architect
> > Digital Assets, Industry Solutions, and Cybersecurity
> > IBM Z/LinuxONE, Asia-Pacific
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
>
>
> --
> Jay Maynard
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to