1440 used to mean unlimited, but there's been an alternative for a long time.

-- 
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר



________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Phil Smith III
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2025 8:30 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Disable user timeout via JWT?


External Message: Use Caution


Oh, 2400 means unlimited? That's the format of JWT/TWT. I assumed it meant what 
it said--24 hours. I guess I can try that next, if necessary!

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
Mike Schwab
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2025 8:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Disable user timeout via JWT?

24 hours / 1440 minutes is unlimited, right?

On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 2:36 PM Phil Smith III <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes. That's where we started this discussion. That only goes to 24
> hours; I want to turn it OFF. Don't even care about jobs, TBH--it's our box.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On
> Behalf Of Matthew Stitt
> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2025 3:30 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Disable user timeout via JWT?
>
> I believe it is SMFPRMxx JWT parameter.  I think that applies to jobs
> also.  The default is 30 minutes I believe.  We have it set to 12 hours.
>
> Matthew
>
> On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:16:20 -0400, Steve Thompson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >About 10 years ago, I used a different way, via OE, to set a timer
> >that wakes up after x minutes to then go to sleep for another y minutes....
> >(you can set the loop to terminate after some number of wakeups... So
> >running ISPF this was started using
> >=6 (?) in the active ISPF session as I recall. I seem to remember
> >having to hit PA1 or ATTN to get control back.
> >
> >Since the TSO session appears active because of this minimal amount
> >of activity, it will not get logged off until you cross the TIME
> >limit. So if you have the SMF exit to keep that from happening.....
> >
> >Just an idea.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Steve Thompson
> >
> >On 5/14/2025 1:10 PM, David Spiegel wrote:
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On 2025-05-14 12:56, Phil Smith III wrote:
> >>> As I said, it's a dev system behind a VPN. At any given moment
> >>> there are an average of zero users connected at the moment. If I
> >>> connect to check something and leave my connection active, I'd
> >>> like it to stay connected. There's no reason to force me off per se, ever.
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On
> >>> Behalf Of David Elliot
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2025 12:39 PM
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>> Subject: Fwd: Disable user timeout via JWT?
> >>>
> >>> Is there any reason why idle users should not be forced off the
> >>> system.?
> >>>
> >>> Sounds like very sloppy system management.to allow this.
> >>>
> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> >>> From: Phil Smith III <[email protected]>
> >>> Date: Wed, 14 May 2025, 15:02
> >>> Subject: Re: Disable user timeout via JWT?
> >>> To: <[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hmm. Still got an S522 overnight, so I guess that wasn't what you
> >>> meant?
> >>>
> >>> TWT looks to have the same 24-hour limit as JWT? This is a dev
> >>> system, we don't want users forced at all. Surely that's not
> >>> unique, and doesn't require use of an exit?!
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On
> >>> Behalf Of Phil Smith III
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2025 5:58 PM
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>> Subject: Re: Disable user timeout via JWT?
> >>>
> >>> I think I did #2:
> >>>
> >>> //DYNISPFM EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01,DYNAMNBR=200,TIME=1440
> >>> //             PARM='%DYNISPF'
> >>>
> >>> That's in my logon PROC. Is that what you meant? Yes, I know very
> >>> little about this end of z/OS (or most other ends).
> >>>
> >>> I did make the change from IBMUSER and then log off and back on to
> >>> be sure I wasn't locking myself out!
> >>>
> >>> Is there a way to look at the time limit for a running job? I
> >>> scrolled wayyyy right in SDSF and didn't see it.
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On
> >>> Behalf Of Radoslaw Skorupka
> >>> Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2025 11:16 AM
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>> Subject: Re: Disable user timeout via JWT?
> >>>
> >>> W dniu 10.05.2025 o 16:33, Phil Smith III pisze:
> >>>> Is there a way to keep idle users from getting forced off?
> >>>> JWT in
> >>> SMFPRMxx is documented as taking values 0001 to 2400. We have a
> >>> handful of users on a development system behind a VPN and don't
> >>> want them forced off ever. Is there an easy way to achieve this?
> >>>
> >>> Few remarks:
> >>> 1. Use TWT instead of JWT. TWT is quite new (younger than me
> >>> ;-) ). It is for TSO users.
> >>> 2. Use TIME=1440 (or NOLIMIT for modern installations ;-) ) in the
> >>> logon procedure. It disables both JWT or TWT.
> >>> 3. Don't forget about TCPIP settings. I can't remember the name,
> >>> but network folks like to drop inactive sessions. This is
> >>> independent from JWT/TWT, TIME=1440 and other TSO settings.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Radoslaw Skorupka
> >>> Lodz, Poland
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>


--
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to