Don't judge what AI will eventually be able to do by current artificial stupidity engines.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of Andrew Rowley <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2025 7:51 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: RTFM External Message: Use Caution On 26/05/2025 9:15 am, Lennie Bradshaw wrote: > Wrong answers can be challenged in AI. You can ask AI where the references > come from. You can suggest alternatives and get a changed response. This > isn't just a better google. This is useful to me. Work with the AI and > together you can work out things that are difficult on your own. I'm not saying it can't be useful. But it produces wrong answers with equal confidence as correct answers. If you know enough to challenge the wrong answers that's OK. But it's used in lots of situations where people won't recognize the wrong answers. The success of AI is based on situations where people want convincing answers quickly and cheaply but don't care whether they are correct e.g. customer support. I don't think that's going to have good results long term... -- Andrew Rowley Black Hill Software ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
