> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] > On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 3:37 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Storage paradigm [was: RE: Data volumes] > > In > <985915eee6984740ae93f8495c624c6c23194bd...@jscpcwexmaa1.bsg.ad.adp.com > >, > on 06/10/2013 > at 02:46 PM, "Farley, Peter x23353" <peter.far...@broadridge.com> > said: > > >There *are* non-theoretical solutions to "runaway" file output. The > >*ix system model of using "disk quotas" per "user" makes it entirely > >possible to imagine z/OS "application" users with "reasonable" disk > >quotas specific to the application (i.e., not by job but by suite of > >jobs). > > Mommy, make it go away. An out of control job would kill unrelated > work. Per file quotas might be workable, but would lead to the same > types of outcry as space specification: "I don't know how much output > the job will create."
No. Regards Thomas Berg ____________________________________________________________________ Thomas Berg Specialist z/OS\RQM\IT Delivery SWEDBANK AB (Publ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
