I keep trying to use the BOTTOM (BO) command, which in TSPF is an alias for 
DOWN MAX. Once in a while <g> PL/I habits trip me up in REXX.

-- 
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר




________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of 
Phil Smith III <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 3, 2025 10:39 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: AIX Question


External Message: Use Caution


Well said, Gary! Though of course XEDIT *is* the best :)

I probably said this already, and it ain't nobody's fault, but my biggest 
problem with editors is when they're similar: ISPF and XEDIT both have FIND 
commands, which do different things. vi has / for search, like XEDIT (but not 
ISPF). Etc. I can reprogram my brain pretty easily to use i and o and like that 
in vi because it looks so different, but I find myself doing FIND in XEDIT when 
I mean / and / in ISPF when I mean FIND etc.

We obviously need a government Department of Editors! /s

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
Gary Eheman
Sent: Friday, October 3, 2025 10:30 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: AIX Question

Prefaced with the old analogy that   "Editors are like philosophy and religion. 
Mine is best and you won't convince me otherwise."

As a person who is asked to login and fix things on all flavors  (sometimes 
*very* ancient releases)  of  "*ix" and "*ux",  the beauty of "vi" is that I 
can count on it being present, and it works.  I need that consistency in my 
life.  If I need a little more text manipulation power, I can reach regular 
expressions and awk or sed or both for the same availability reason. Every 
editor exists because a developer thought they needed a better one than the one 
they were using. It is too easy to bad mouth any editor. I resist. See my 
opening sentence.

On Thu, 2 Oct 2025 18:26:10 -0500, Steve Beaver <[email protected]> wrote:

>Some of you may not remember that there used to be a PC product named SPFPC.
>
>Has anyone ever seen an equivalent product for AIX or Linux.
>
>VI is a uselessly pain
>
>
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>No one said I could type with one thumb
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
>email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to