What version of MQ are you running? The latest is V10, though it just came out. 9.1 is out of support. 9.2 I think is still supported. 9.3 and 9.4 are definitely still supported.
Peter On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 12:33:49 +0000, rpinion865 <[email protected]> wrote: >EXACTLY! Which is why I am asking on the list. Our MQ/CICS >SYSPROG has sent a question to IBM. But IBM says we are not >licensed for MQ. Strange, since we are paying for it. Although, >the MQ/CICS SYSPROG does not seem to be in a hurry to get the >question of support resolved. > >Richard Pinion > > > >"Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit." > >Bugs Bunny > >Sent with Proton Mail secure email. > >On Thursday, July 30th, 2026 at 2:28 PM, Peter Relson ><[email protected]> wrote: > >> <snip> >> I feel confident that loading the module into LPA will not >> cause any problems, since the module is RENT/REUS. I just >> want to make sure. >> </snip> >> >> You might be right that it is OK to place the module into LPA, but being >> "confident" is way further than you should be. Not every RENT/REUS module >> can be in LPA. And sometimes an application will have dependencies on the >> location of its modules. A good rule is that you should not place anyone >> else's modules into LPA without explicit indication that it is OK to do so. >> >> Peter Relson >> z/OS Core Technology Design (retired) >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
