PDS 8.6 includes an update in place if the same size.  Just schedule a
job with the needed change commands.
https://www.cbttape.org/freepds.htm

On Sat, Aug 1, 2026 at 6:32 AM Roger Lowe
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> zOS Change Tracker - https://www.ibm.com/products/zos-change-tracker
>
> Roger
>
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 13:20:04 +0000, listserv.ua.edu 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >I have multiple SYSPlexes in different data centers, none of which share 
> >DASD (some data centers have multiple SYSPlexes). All LPARs currently run 
> >zOS 3.1 which is fairly up to date regarding maintenance.
> >
> >I have a common PDS (PDS-E actually) which is a commonly named PDS. Let's 
> >call it AA.BB.CC . All updates to any member of AA.BB.CC should be via a TSO 
> >user via ISPF edit. Thinking about it, I'd also like to sync members without 
> >the ISPF timestamp, although if this occurred, not replace like members if 
> >they didn't have the ISPF timestamp, since there's no way to know which one 
> >is newest,
> >
> >The rule is, I have one LPAR where all of the updates should take place, 
> >although I don't want to depend on that. So all the updates should be made 
> >on LPAR A. But if someone did update a member on LPAR B in a different 
> >SYSSPlex, all of the PDS's would get that update as well.
> >
> >Is there something in zOS FTP, or potentially a product (IBM or vendor), 
> >which will allow me to "sync" the members? So that no matter which LPAR an 
> >update to a member happened, all the datasets would get the newest member?
> >
> >This wouldn't have to be simultaneous ... I can run scheduled batch on one 
> >or potentially all of the involved LPARS on all of the SYSPlexes on off 
> >hours. So if the "sync" occurred once at night, that would be sufficient. 
> >And all of the SYSPlexes are accessible to each other via TCP/IP.
> >
> >And yes, I could use RACF to lock out updating the dataset on LPARs wher it 
> >shouldn't be updated, although I'd rather not do that.
> >
> >Does anybody else do this or have tackled this before? I'm trying not to 
> >re-invent the wheel here.
> >
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to