On Jun 27, 2013, at 10:10 AM, John McKown <john.archie.mck...@gmail.com> wrote:

> But, since
> each CP has its own "real" address 0 range of 8K, are the other CP's FLC
> mapped into virtual storage on this CP?

The answer is yes; each processor is described by a control block called the 
PCCA and field PCCAPSAV in that control block points to the processor's PSA.

> If so, then I guess it would be
> possible for FLC to become corrupted by an errant key 0 routine. Which
> would make me hope that the FLC for the "other" CPs are not mapped into the
> virtual address space at all.

I don't know if this is an issue or not.

-- 
Curtis Pew (c....@its.utexas.edu)
ITS Systems Core
The University of Texas at Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to