On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:06:21 -0400, John Gilmore wrote: >Here I agree strongly with Shmuel. Make the data read-only or >inaccessible if you must, but leave the tools alone. > In the intense discussion of this topic here in April 2010, IBM employes took the position that that is ineffective or not feasible. Since IBM's policies in such cases prohibit more detailed technical discussion, we are unable to assess the merits of that assertion.
I continue to suspect that IBM could have provided a more narrowly targeted remedy, but chose not to do so, perhaps for reasons they're not allowed to discuss. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
