In <cae1xxdhosowjbjwsbdfaqjtt2namcqjsbg2y78y7heomz3a...@mail.gmail.com>, on 07/23/2013 at 08:07 PM, John Gilmore <jwgli...@gmail.com> said:
>I am happy to have David join in my recommendation, and I can imagine >a circumstance in which RLLG would be more useful than RLL, but RLL >itself does 64-bit rotations. "For ROTATE LEFT SINGLE LOGICAL (RLL), bits 0-31 of general registers R1 and R3 remain unchanged." -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN