Yes, I saw that also. Charles
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Sam Siegel Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 11:35 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Any clues on fwrite_unlocked() On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> wrote: > Sorry, yes, that is what I meant. Cut-and-pasted the wrong line from > the source file. Correct paste follows: > > #define _OPEN_SYS_UNLOCKED_EXT 1 > very odd ... I looked in sys1.cee.sceeh.h(stdio) and found _OPEN_SYS_UNLOCKED_EXT. It seems to be controlling the visibilty of fwrite_unlocked. However, fwrite_unlocked is wrapped in a macro called __new410A that I'm not familiar with. Not sure what impact that has. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
