Thanks, Mark. This looks like the simplest way to handle it. I guess, since I haven't needed the 92 Sub 11 in forever, turning off collection is safe enough.
Cheers,,,Steve Steven F. Conway, CISSP LA Systems z/OS Systems Support Phone: 703.295.1926 [email protected] From: Mark Zelden <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 08/26/2013 03:09 PM Subject: Re: PFA & SMF Type 92 Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 14:07:04 -0400, Steve Conway <[email protected]> wrote: >Good afternoon, > >Testing z/OS 1.13, and I (finally) implemented PFA. I like the idea of >the checks it performs, but it's killing (well, wounding, anyway) my SMF >with the Type 92 Subtype 11 (Filesystem CLOSE) records. > My client has a large mainframe WebSphere environment and I've had 92 subtypes 11 & 12 excluded for years because of this. So unless you really need that data for analysis all the time, I would turn them off until such time you want / need them. I know a lot of people are collecting 99s these days, but I have them turned off also. Here is an example of what I am using in my SMFPRMxx: SYS(NOTYPE(4,5,19,20,34,35,40,69,92(10:11),99) Regards, Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:[email protected] Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
