Sorry about that.  The last two paragraphs of my previous post should be

There is nothing analogous to the HLASM option alternatives
NOGOFF|GOFF  available for COBOL 5.1.  COBOL source libraries can
continue to be PDSs, but COBOL executables must be stored in PDSEs.

This should hold no terrors for anyone.  PDSEs can be highly
problematic at IPL time: suppoprt for their use is not always
available early enough.  For COBOL APs they are technically
unproblematic.  The requirement that PDSEs be used for executables
may, of course, pose bureaucratic problems for some large shops, but
these problems can be surmounted, and  they should anyway have been
addressed long ago.

John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to