Tony Harminc wrote: >We agreed with the customer. Customer is *always* correct. :-D
>We had been treating any non-zero RC from SMFWTM as an error (with a not very >informative generic message), so we changed our code to treat only some RCs as >errors, and merely report in summary on others at product shutdown, e.g. "nnn >SMF records were suppressed by SMF configuration", "nnn SMF records were >suppressed by SMF installation exit", etc. I know that some products write on SYSLOG if there is a problem with SMF, say if the SMF buffers are full or suppressed or something like that. I have set up my automation software to respond on it or notify us. Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
