In <ofe33189b1.4a8f7060-on48257c15.001e5f0f-48257c15.001ee...@sg.ibm.com>, on 10/31/2013 at 01:35 PM, Timothy Sipples <sipp...@sg.ibm.com> said:
>It does not (if referring to ported applications), Ported applications do not run in a vacuum. >and repeating a falsehood Such as the claim that z/OS does not require EBCDIC. >EBCDIC support is required if and only if there is a requirement to >operate on/with EBCDIC-encoded data. Water is wet. >There is no requirement to store user data in EBCDIC, That's only true if you carefully define "user data" in such a fashion as to exclude things that most users would call "user data". >Precision here is particularly important. Then please change your story to "There are situations in which z/OS does not require EBCDIC", which is not only more precise but actually true? >I would humbly suggest that those who are misleading members of >the open source community about z/OS are not doing anyone any >favors. We agree on that; where we disagree is on who is misleading them. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN