Thank you for the suggestions and the willing to share your experience.
1. level of Operating System is z/OS 1.13.
2. The customer is not yet determine how he wants to set up the security in
his HSM
He intial request was to take the strictest security method HSM provide
(TAPESECURITY(RACF)).
After some thoughts and discussion he seems to prefer that his tape
managemnet system (CNTL-T) would take care
of the security (as suggested here on the thread).
On 27 November 2013 20:48, retired mainframer <retired-mainfra...@q.com>wrote:
> At our customers' sites that use HSM, we use
> TAPESECURITY(EXPIRATIONINCLUDE)) and let the tape management system (CA-1)
> handle tape security issues in conjunction with normal RACF dataset
> protection. None of the HSM volsers are entered into RACF. Making HSM an
> External Data Manager to CA-1 handles the expiration issues.
>
> :>: -----Original Message-----
> :>: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On
> :>: Behalf Of Arye Shemer
> :>: Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 7:05 AM
> :>: To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> :>: Subject: DFSMSHSM TAPESECURITY(RACF)
> :>:
> :>: Hello dear experts.
> :>:
> :>: I have a customer who is considering using HSM (never used HSM before).
> :>:
> :>: We are trying to understand if when using TAPESECURITY(RACF) option of
> :>: HSM
> :>:
> :>: We also have to add manually each HSM VOLSER into the RACF TAPEVOL
> :>: HSMABR
> :>: profile.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
