Russ, I am most curious about how those messages were written, given that an SVC call is not allowed in zIIP mode. Did the non-zIIP code open a data set and buffers, then the zIIP code put data into them and never filled a buffer, and then the non-zIIP code closed the data set forcing the buffer to be written? Or have I missed something?
For the record, we are a licensed user of the zIIP API. Chris Blaicher Principal Software Engineer, Software Development Syncsort Incorporated 50 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677 P: 201-930-8260 | M: 512-627-3803 E: cblaic...@syncsort.com -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Russ Teubner Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 12:39 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: COBOL IN SRB Mode (Was Un-authorized caller) Just to take this discussion of the theoretical realm, consider the following output (both HBZIQSRB and HBZICOB were run on a zIIP): 20130928 201457.334405 HBZIQSRB CEEPIPI CALL,CALL_SUB_ADDR_NOCHK2 20130928 201457.334938 HBZICOB ENTRY 20130928 201457.342362 HBZICOB Hello World from COBOL! 20130928 201457.342364 HBZICOB EXIT 20130928 201457.342367 HBZIQSRB CEEPIPI RETURN,CALL_SUB_ADDR_NOCHK2 Russ Teubner HostBridge Technology ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
