On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Paul Gilmartin <paulgboul...@aim.com>wrote:
<snip> > IBM is the only vendor I know of that enforces such an archaic restriction, > at least with CMS and TSO. But it's getting better with Unix System > Services. > (I suspect not with VM/CMS Open Extensions.) It's time IBM woke up. > This is why I like to keep my JCL and source in z/OS UNIX files rather than PDSEs. I have a Linux/Intel desktop in addition to the standard MS Windows. I use a multi-tabbed Konsole set up wherein I do multiple ssh sessions into a z/OS UNIX shell (not that I like /bin/sh compared to BASH). Of course, this means that I cannot use ISPF edit as much as I would like. I really need to NFS share my z/OS UNIX files to my Linux desktop. I'm just too damn lazy to justify it to management. Yes, they will starts asking what the <elided> is GFSCPROC or NFSCLIENT and why is it running? My boss already dislikes my use of UNIX because "nobody else understands it". > > In the bad old days when carbon was cheaper tnan siilcon, we couldn't > even afford one terminal per programmer; we had to share. Things > should be different now. > > -- gil > > -- Wasn't there something about a PASCAL programmer knowing the value of everything and the Wirth of nothing? Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
