On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:41:08 -0500, John Gilmore <jwgli...@gmail.com> wrote:
. . . >Since, however, the storage is being declared/allocated in bytes, it >seems clear to me that the length is/ought to be expressed in bytes >too. I do not see much rationale for your different view in this >particular context. > If the length, in bytes, of ITMAP was required, I would be inclined to use L'ITMAP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
