In <4922808670825025.wa.paulgboulderaim....@listserv.ua.edu>, on
03/23/2014
at 10:58 AM, Paul Gilmartin <paulgboul...@aim.com> said:
>The question makes no sense;
I''m not asking a question; I'm pointing out a false analogy. "TCP/IP,
in contrast, is blessedly tolerant." makes no sense.
>a server listens on a port
And an SNA application on a host opens an ACB for a specific LU.
>Give me more details of what you're asking me to try.
I'm asking in what sense TCP/IP is more tolerant than SNA. It's
certainly not in the ability to run multiple applications on the same
host, since SNA does that as well as TCP/IP does.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
