In
<of74e1b14a.83f8d689-on88257d07.0057ca48-88257d07.0059b...@sce.com>,
on 06/30/2014
at 09:19 AM, Skip Robinson <jo.skip.robin...@sce.com> said:
> Rexx does not have all three types parameters,
I believe that the Rexx-callable routine that you're thinking of is
XPARSE; I don't recall the author.
>One power of TSO commands is that these keywords are managed by
>the command processor itself. Prompting to resolve ambiguity, for
>example, is handled before user code gets control.
The command processor *is* user code. It's the user code that invokes
PARSE, unlike some systems where command syntax is defined externally
to the command routine.
FWIW, a TSO command can exploit the stack in ways that a Rexx routine
cannot.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
