In <1151288736361378.wa.paulgboulderaim....@listserv.ua.edu>, on 07/29/2014 at 01:01 AM, Paul Gilmartin <0000000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> said:
>On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 08:44:08 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: >> on 07/27/2014 at 08:59 AM, Paul Gilmartin said: >> >>>They didn't *need* to make it inconsistent. >> >>No, but is there a business case for developing the infrastructure to >>keep such things consistent? It's neither automatic nor free. >> >Errr... Reusable code? Developing subroutines usable from both JES2 and JES3 is a different issue from developing and enforcing standards. The standards by themselves would not lead to reusable code. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN