In <1151288736361378.wa.paulgboulderaim....@listserv.ua.edu>, on
07/29/2014
at 01:01 AM, Paul Gilmartin
<0000000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> said:
>On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 08:44:08 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
>> on 07/27/2014 at 08:59 AM, Paul Gilmartin said:
>>
>>>They didn't *need* to make it inconsistent.
>>
>>No, but is there a business case for developing the infrastructure to
>>keep such things consistent? It's neither automatic nor free.
>>
>Errr... Reusable code?
Developing subroutines usable from both JES2 and JES3 is a different
issue from developing and enforcing standards. The standards by
themselves would not lead to reusable code.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
