Hi all, The config is okay when done in 2 steps, 1. Delete target CHP. + hw/sw IODF activate 2. Add new CHP + hw/sw IODF activate
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:15 PM, John D Levine <jdlev...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > After the CF command, did you vary the path online? > > > John L. > > > > > From: Cobe Xu <cob...@gmail.com> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Date: 10/02/2014 08:23 PM > Subject: Re: HCD Question > Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> > > > > Hi all, > > Yes, the cables physically changed connect from DASD box to Tape > controller. > I think J.O is right, maybe I should config one IODF to remove the links > first,then config new stuff... as now I did all in one step.. > > Below are CF CHP message: > > CF CHP(A1),ONLINE > IOS156I THE FOLLOWING DEVICES ARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR USE: 524 > CB10-CB5F > D M=CHP(A1) > IEE174I 00.45.43 DISPLAY M 526 > DISPLAY M RESOURCE 'PATH' IS CURRENTLY IN USE > CHPID A1: TYPE=1D, DESC=FICON INCOMPLETE, ONLINE > DEVICE STATUS FOR CHANNEL PATH A1 > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F > CB1 +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ > CB2 +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ > CB3 +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ > CB4 +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ > CB5 +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ +@ > SWITCH DEVICE NUMBER = NONE > ATTACHED ND = NOT KNOWN > PHYSICAL CHANNEL ID = 0101 > ************************ SYMBOL EXPLANATIONS ************************ > + ONLINE @ PATH NOT VALIDATED - OFFLINE . DOES NOT EXIST > * PHYSICALLY ONLINE \ PATH NOT OPERATIONAL > > V CB10,ONLINE > IEE103I UNIT CB10 NOT BROUGHT ONLINE 528 > IEE763I NAME= IECVIOPM CODE= 0000000400000000 > IOS551I NO PATHS PHYSICALLY AVAILABLE > IEE764I END OF IEE103I RELATED MESSAGES > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 6:13 AM, J O Skip Robinson > <jo.skip.robin...@sce.com> > wrote: > > > For some types of what I'll all 'radical' changes, we've found it > > necessary to implement in two steps. The first step deletes the old > stuff. > > The second step adds the new stuff back where the old stuff used to be. > > Each step requires full h/w and s/w activation. > > > > If instead you try to transform one kind of gizmo into another in a > single > > step, you can get weird results. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > > Behalf Of John D Levine > > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 12:44 PM > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Subject: Re: HCD Question > > > > Hi Xu, you did not say whether the cabling has moved from the DASD box > to > > the Tape controller. However, a POR is not necessary to implement this > > change. Perhaps you can post the messages from your CF command or VARY > > command. > > > > > > John L. > > > > > > > > From: "Neubert, Kevin" <kevin.neub...@courts.wa.gov> > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Date: 10/02/2014 01:50 PM > > Subject: Re: HCD Question > > Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> > > > > > > > > Need to see more information, but If you're confident with the > definitions > > and the activates were indeed successful, sounds more like cabling, etc. > > What do D M=CHP() and D M=DEV() show for your respective changes? Any > > DOES NOT EXIST/NOT IN SYSTEM type messages? > > > > Regards, > > > > Kevin > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > > Behalf Of Cobe Xu > > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 10:20 AM > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Subject: HCD Question > > > > Hi list, > > > > Nowadays, I think most of IODF changes can be dynamic activated and take > > effective to all Lpars within CPC. i.e. No POR > > > > My case is to re-config 2 FC channels from DASD box to a new Tape box. > > Also, add new CU/device for the TAPE box. > > > > However, when I perform h/w Activate from one lpar with new IODF, and > SOFT > > activate in every LPAR... I still got s/w & h/w HSA token in-sync.. And, > > the re-configured 2 FCs are not able to ONLINE porperly with the > attached > > devices... > > > > I wonder if I miss some operations? or actually POR is necessary for > such > > case.... ? > > > > Thanks! > > - > > Cobe Xu > > > > Best Regards > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > z/OS Performance & Capacity Analyst > > z/OS System Programmer > > Email: cob...@gmail.com > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > > -- > Cobe Xu > > Best Regards > ----------------------------------------------------------- > z/OS Performance & Capacity Analyst > z/OS System Programmer > Email: cob...@gmail.com > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards ----------------------------------------------------------- z/OS Performance & Capacity Analyst z/OS System Programmer Email: cob...@gmail.com ----------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
