Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM wrote: >That a tricky question: VLF writes SMF 41 records, but they are unusable for >LLA. Since LLA manages its VLF cache and knows what is in it and what is not, >it will always have a 100% hitratio on its VLF cache, which will be reported >by VLF records 41. Via LLA exits 1 and 2, we write SMF records with useful LLA >information and these records provide how many fetches LLA does from its VLF >cache and how many from disk. From that ratio, we decide if the VLF cache is >sufficient or not.
Hmmm. Very Interesting, I have a gut feeling about SMF 41, but the contents seemed to (at least) me that it do no answer this thread. I should have looked at LLA too. Thanks, I really appreciate your informative reply, you cured my curiousity! It is much appreciated! Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
