In <20141221173446.fd8ed08264703ad3452c5...@gmx.net>, on 12/21/2014
at 05:34 PM, ibmmain <nitz-...@gmx.net> said:
>Nice summary, Peter. Do you happen to know who puts in //STARTING JOB
>... when MEMBER is only contained in the JES2 proclib concatenation
>and not in MSTJCL?
Presumably IEEVSTAR for START, but the processing is similar for,
e.g., LOGON, MOUNT.
>I have a MEMBER that starts with a JOB statement in a proclib. As
>long as that proclib is in both MSTJCL and JES2 proclib concat, all
>is well.
So it works when you follow the rules.
>As soon as I remove the proclib containing MEMBER from MSTJCL, I get
>a //STARTING JOB ... in my JCL and of course a JCL error because my
>JCL already contains a JOB statement.
And it doesn't work when you don't follow the rules.
>I am assuming that it is JES2 that puts these extraneous two lines
>in.
No. The lines that *you* added were extraneous; a JES2 or JES3 proclib
concatenation is supposed to contain cataloged procedures, not jobs.
>I didn't even find the place where this behaviour is described.
What do the JE2 and JES3 initialization manusls say about proclib
concatenations?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
