>>> On 1/15/2015 at 02:53 PM, "Chase, John" <jch...@ussco.com> wrote: > I believe that's because z/VM is "significantly cheaper" if run in an > IFL-only LPAR.
That certainly used to be true, but I'm not at all sure it still is the case. If I'm remembering right, z/VM licensing is the same for both CPs and IFLs. It's just that if you _do_ have a machine with both and you create a z/VM mode LPAR, then the z/VM licensing algorithm includes _all_ those processors instead of just CPs or just IFLs. Mark Post ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
