In <7400357838260860.wa.paulgboulderaim....@listserv.ua.edu>, on 02/15/2015 at 03:24 PM, Paul Gilmartin <0000000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> said:
>Should have been easy enough for you; GIYF. Only if I didn't care about gfetting the same one you were looking at. >http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ieam900/m012661.htm Argh! Takes me indirectly to a blank page. I'll look at the V1R11 version, which I have on disk. >It's interesting that the explanation contains "Operator response" >and "System programmer response" but not User Response which would >seem more relevant. Now *that* warrants an RCF! Sent. >I can't suss out from that page which utility is issuing the >message, IBM seems to be treating DFSMS DFP as a unit instead of breaking it down by utility. It's either IEBCOPY or a DFP service invoked by IEBCOPY. The text also doesn't say whether the user is using COPY or COPYMOD, nor does it distinguish between the two types of PDSE. Still, the text does *not* say that you cannot copy a load module (in a PDS) into a PDSE. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
