Yes, thats it. In this CSI we although have JAVA 5 installed. JAVA 5 isn't named in the PRODSUP subentry, so it's reported correctly. But I agree that the interpretation of PRODSUP isn't correct, because there is no reason against installing several JAVA versions in parallel in the same CSI.
Can I delete this misleading PRODSUP entry via UCLIN? If yes, do you have a syntax sample? Regards Juergen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
