On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Farley, Peter x23353 < peter.far...@broadridge.com> wrote:
> John, > > Confirmed. It seems to treat the out-of-sequence level number as just the > next logical level down (i.e., treats level 12 just like level 15 after the > preceding level 10). For this example code: > > Thanks for testing that. I put in my "fix", but I did it by putting in the "missing" level as a FILLER in what I _hoped_ was the proper place in the code. That got it to compile in GNU COBOL. But the results of a "group move" would not be equivalent, as best as I know of such things. I really wonder if this is what IBM intended? I hope Mr. Ross of the COBOL persuasion at IBM sees this thread and comments on it. Personally, I prefer the GNU result. It just looks wrong to me. -- Schrodinger's backup: The condition of any backup is unknown until a restore is attempted. Yoda of Borg, we are. Futile, resistance is, yes. Assimilated, you will be. He's about as useful as a wax frying pan. 10 to the 12th power microphones = 1 Megaphone Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
