Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Did you read the article about Goodman?


Yes, very amusing, but not apt. scp has been around for decades and its usage uniformly (outside OMVS) has been for mixed binary
and textual data. There is no switch to differentiate, ergo it views everything 
as binary data.

You can invoke Goodman but it's only a nerdly joke w/r/t to the subject at hand. It's not relevant to a piece of software with millions of users which has worn a deep groove of usage across two decades. IBM's diddling it to automatically do char translation without
recourse is absurd.

--
Jack J. Woehr     # Science is more than a body of knowledge. It's a way of
www.well.com/~jax # thinking, a way of skeptically interrogating the universe
www.softwoehr.com # with a fine understanding of human fallibility. - Carl Sagan

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to