Radoslaw Skorupka wrote: >It's IMHO very obvious that offline RACFdb can be copied as regular dataset, >Actually I did mean copy of live RACF db with the tools like IEBGENER or >ADRDSSU (in monoplex) with no ill effects. So my *very limited* experience >says it is not so easy to get inconsistent copy of RACF db.
>Of course it is still russian rulette, so even if the risk is small (I didn't >say that!), it's still worth to use proper tools. Russian Roulette? ;-) True. Risks are truly small if you're grown up and very responsible... ;-) >I'd suggest always use UT200 then UT400 (against the copy) if needed. Correct! This is what I do. First UT200, then UT400 (on that copy you said) and then perhaps usual DFDSS dump very later. >Reason: UT200 is easier to use and faster. Yup! UT400 does some re-org during the copy. Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
