On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 23:00:21 -0500, ibmmain.10.ats...@xoxy.net wrote:

>Hmm.  Four(*) follow-ups (plus this one), and only one
>(mine) in response to the OP.  If you don't want anonymous
>posts, don't show the enormous power anonymous posters have
>to hijack threads.

This from an anonymous poster who has only posted twice, and only in this 
thread. 
And of the six posts that I see on this thread on the listserv, only his are 
anonymous. 
"Only one ... in response to the OP." Do you mean by this that the other posts 
were 
in response to other posts, yet consistent with what the OP wrote?

So I wonder. Are you a newcomer here,or did you create yet another anonymous 
email just for these posts about anonymous posters?

>(*) If you see only three, it's because you're reading the
>listserv rather than the newsgroup.

This a listserv, not a newsgroup. That someone has created a newsgroup to copy 
messages from the listserv does not change that fact. From time to time someone 
sends out a reminder to that fact. Posts to the newsgroup are not part of this 
list, and 
I see no reason that I should seek them out.

-- 
Tom Marchant

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to