I agree that the main object of the HC was to alert for an over-threshold situation.
But 'logging' in HC by VERBOSE YES is not an elegant way. That is what SMF was invented for: log information for the sake of logging it, just because it might be needed (weeks/months) later. I will wait what the answer in the PMR will be, maybe they direct me to the correct route. Kees. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter Relson Sent: 16 March, 2016 13:38 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SMF41 VLF info and ALERTAGE >why tell HC and not me? It did tell you. By the check messages. The main thought was that the important situation to tell you about was when trimming is happening too much. Thus the health check exception message is the right way to tell you. You can use the VERBOSE(YES) option of the health check to request showing of the information for all the classes, not just those that are in exception. Further, even previous health check information remains available through the logstream. So some of the rationale for "needing" it in SMF is a bit weak. >I already opened a PMR for adding the info to SMF 41-3. A PMR is not the right vehicle these days for requesting new function. Given that RFE is available, I would not bet that IBM level 2 will convert PMR's to RFE's any longer. They might, I just don't know. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ******************************************************** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286 ******************************************************** ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
