On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 10:18:37 -0500, Peter Relson wrote: >>Is SIZE simply ignored by Binder? Or has it any effect, >>possibly beneficial or harmful? > >Not being hindered by knowledge, I can make a guess: > >The binder does pay attention to SIZE. It could not get more storage than >your region size in any case, so SIZE really could only lessen the amount >of storage available. > Feels like substance for a clarification RCF.
>Why you'd want to lessen that amount, I have no idea. > SMP/E, for example ATTACHes concurrent Binder tasks. One might not want the first one to bogart all storage to exclusion of others. But SMP/E ought to make that call and/or the Ref. or UG ought to provide some guidance. I understand DFSORT is very clever at performing such optimizations. Thanks for the unhindered opinion, gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
