Yes thanks for the feedback. It would be great if you could provide a recap of what you did which may help others in future.
> On 31 Mar 2016, at 6:25 AM, Frank Swarbrick <frank.swarbr...@outlook.com> > wrote: > > Thanks for letting us know! The binder step with DYNAM=DLL and CASE=MIXED > "should have worked", so it was a bit perplexing when it didn't. But this > explains it. > >> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:31:22 -0500 >> From: 0000004dc9e91b6d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu >> Subject: Re: Resolving JNI_CreateJavaVM >> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >> >> It turns out I was missing the DLL option on the compile step. >> >> Thanks for everyone's help! >> Janet >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
