All,
This whole thread has really confused me. Why the blazes do we think that SMS 
is preventing multi volume allocation when it looks to me that it is regular, 
normal, everyday allocation that is preventing multi volume allocation.
Ignoring guaranteed space attribute, if you allocate a dataset with 
UNIT=(3390,3) using IEFBR14 all you will ever get is the primary space 
requested on a single volume. That's it, end of story whether the dataset is 
SMS managed or not. One to five empty extents on one volume.
When you subsequently open and write to the dataset allocation has no knowledge 
of the original allocation of 3 volumes because you have done nothing to 
generate candidates in the catalog. You will write to it on the subsequent open 
and ABEND when you hit 16 extents on the first volume. That's how allocation 
works.
If you want the dataset to overflow to 3 volumes then you must specify 
UNIT=(3390,3) in the JCL of the job step that actually writes to the dataset. 
This works whether it is SMS managed or not.
Ron
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S®6 active, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone-------- 
Original message --------From: Neil Duffee <nduf...@uottawa.ca> Date: 4/8/2016  
05:06  (GMT+08:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] How 
force dataset non-SMS? 
Caveat:  daily digestion causes response delays...

Charles:  I'm gonna go back over some territory to make sure I understand the 
*original* purpose.  I *believe* you simply want a multi-volume dataset for 
SMF17 (Scratch/delete) work in the simplest manner possible.  It can be SMS or 
no, can be any dsOrg, & doesn't require large space. (or any records, even)  
All good so far?

Presuming a yes, I point out that PS files (not EXT) max@16 extents/volume.  

Given that, combine IEBDG (I dropped the suggesting author, sorry), [1] with 
Tom's SPACE=(TRK,(1,1)),UNIT=(SYSALLDA,5) or an SMS DataClas that has 
VolCount/DynVolCnt>1.  You should get 16 tracks on each volume until x37 for 
volume count.  I'd even go with LRECL>29k (0.5 track length) to get 16 records 
per volume.  The creating job should take more time to start/stop than output 
the necessary bytes.

[1]  You could probably IDCAMS PRINT something simple as well if you use the 
large record size.

-------->  signature = 8 lines follows  <--------
Neil Duffee, Joe Sysprog, uOttawa, Ottawa, Ont, Canada
telephone:1 613 562 5800 x4585                  fax:1 613 562 5161
mailto:NDuffee of uOttawa.ca     http:/ /aix1.uOttawa.ca/ ~nduffee
"How *do* you plan for something like that?"  Guardian Bob, Reboot
"For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism."
"Systems Programming: Guilty, until proven innocent"  John Norgauer 2004
"Schrodinger's backup: The condition of any backup is unknown until a restore 
is attempted."  John McKown 2015


-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Mills [mailto:charl...@mcn.org] 
Sent: April 6, 2016 11:36
Subject: Re: How force dataset non-SMS?

Still the same answer. I want a multi-volser dataset and SMS is getting in the 
way of that.

Pure local test. No customers in the problem set.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 10:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How force dataset non-SMS?

On 2016-04-06, at 00:54, Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM wrote:

> ... Why do you need a non-managed dataset?  ...
>  
I might imagine tesing.  The OP might be operating as an and desiring to test 
code that shoulc work in any possible customer environment, either SMS or 
non-SMS.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to