Years ago (pre-9) respacks had to be 'split up'. Now, we ask the risk! -teD Original Message From: Lucas Rosalen Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 05:14 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List Subject: Re: Respack Volume Size Challenge
As far as I have seen, it's quite simple: create a &SYSR2 symbol (using &SYSR1 and changing last char from 1 to 2, for example) and update MCAT accordingly. Once I've worked for a client that had 3-volumes respack. It indeed worked. We used to keep datasets like LINKLIB, MACLIB, NUCLEUS, etc in 1st volumes though... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *Lucas Rosalen* Emails: rosalen.lu...@gmail.com / *lrosa...@pl.ibm.com <lrosa...@br.ibm.com>* LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/in/lrosalen Phone: +48 (71) 792 809 198 2016-04-21 10:45 GMT+02:00 Jake Anderson <justmainfra...@gmail.com>: > Hello, > > From the z/OS 2.1, I have started using Mod-27 as the Load address(Respack) > for IPLing the z/OS 2.1 LPAR. I am curious how the other Shops are managing > when they do not options of using Mod-27 and they have to survive with > Mod-9. I believe the Extended Indirect cataloging is one Options. > > What kind of challenges are there when the Respack is divided into two > Volumes ? > > Jake > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
