Any ID that can grant privileges to another ID.

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Jerry Whitteridge
<jerry.whitteri...@safeway.com> wrote:
> I'd reply to the Auditor "Please define Admin access as there is no one 
> privilege  that grants all access"
>
> Jerry Whitteridge
> Manager Mainframe Systems & Storage
> Albertsons - Safeway Inc.
> 925 738 9443
> Corporate Tieline - 89443
>
> If you feel in control
> you just aren't going fast enough.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On 
> Behalf Of Lester, Bob
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 12:40 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: smp/e sha-2 support?
>
> Hi All,
>
>      What would you make of this request:   "Show me all the users that have 
> admin. Access on the mainframe".  ?
>
> Thanks!
> BobL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On 
> Behalf Of Jerry Whitteridge
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 1:38 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: smp/e sha-2 support? [ EXTERNAL ]
>
> And anyone that thinks Auditors don't set policy and rules hasn't worked in 
> the commercial environment for a while. Let alone the fact of having to train 
> PCI Auditors that the Mainframe isn't just a slightly bigger PC or  Windows 
> server. Some shops could best be summarized as "What the Auditor Wants - The 
> Auditor Gets (Even if it makes no sense at all)"
>
> Even though John is absolutely correct on the implications of using SHA1 for 
> the purposes of receiving patches - the knee jerk reaction is "SHA1 has been 
> superseded as its insecure - everyone must move to SHA2"  (unsaid is even 
> though it makes no sense for what the purpose is)
>
> Jerry Whitteridge
> Manager Mainframe Systems & Storage
> Albertsons - Safeway Inc.
> 925 738 9443
> Corporate Tieline - 89443
>
> If you feel in control
> you just aren't going fast enough.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On 
> Behalf Of Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA)
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 12:26 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: smp/e sha-2 support?
>
> What's going to happen is that IBM will not support SHA-2 (or -3) and every 
> shop with any degree of security (hipaa, sox, dod, ...) will cease to be able 
> to use the internet delivery option. Being told to create an RFE for 
> something that is obvious is troubling and to be told that it doesn't matter 
> is worse. This is not my first shop where auditors dictate a higher level of 
> security than most think required but they are following guidelines from 
> someone higher up that can't be argued with.
>
> Somehow I don't think I'm the first to raise this nor will I be the last.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Lionel B. Dyck
>
> --- Opinions expressed are my own and not my employer ---
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On 
> Behalf Of Phil Smith III
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 10:48 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: smp/e sha-2 support?
>
> Charles Mills wrote:
>
>>I suspect you've got a problem, however. There's a saying in sales
>>"when
> you
>
>>explain, you lose." I can hear auditors saying "SHA-1 -- no good --
> security
>
>>exposure" and I would not want to be the one explaining what you say
>>below
>
>>to them.
>
>
>
>>Perhaps I underestimate IT auditors. I just know the "buzzword kneejerk"
>
>>problem.
>
>
>
> I reluctantly have to support this position (not because I don't generally 
> agree with Charles, but because it flies in the face of reason).
>
>
>
> "Trouble is, sheep are very dim. Once they get an idea in their 'eads, 
> there's no shiftin' it." Same applies to far too many auditors/QSAs/et al.
>
>
>
> SHA-1 is dead; "good enough" or not, there's no reason to use it any more, 
> given that SHA-2 (and, hey, SHA-3!) exist, eh?
>
>
>
> .phsiii
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
> lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
> lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN 
> ________________________________
>  Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the corporate 
> e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than 
> the recipient. This e-mail may contain proprietary information and is 
> intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this 
> message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have 
> received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, 
> distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately.
> ________________________________
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
> lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> This e-mail transmission may contain information that is proprietary, 
> privileged and/or confidential and is intended exclusively for the person(s) 
> to whom it is addressed. Any use, copying, retention or disclosure by any 
> person other than the intended recipient or the intended recipient's 
> designees is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient or 
> their designee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and 
> delete all copies. OppenheimerFunds may, at its sole discretion, monitor, 
> review, retain and/or disclose the content of all email communications.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> ________________________________
>  Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the corporate 
> e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than 
> the recipient. This e-mail may contain proprietary information and is 
> intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this 
> message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have 
> received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, 
> distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately.
> ________________________________
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to