Hi Peter, I think it still goes back to the original contract that has you entitled to RMF, so I would check that first.
Best regards, Cheryl -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter Ten Eyck Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2016 8:56 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SMF type 89 records reporting RMF usage After some research... I am starting to think this might be the case. It appears we had RMF enabled in IFAPRD00, but were not running it. We are running CMF. Can a SMF type 89 record indicating RMF use be cut under these circumstances? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
