On Wed, 3 Aug 2016 08:10:25 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote: >My preference is to always code a HASPPARM dd statement. That way you do not >get a misleading >IEC130I HASPPARM DD STATEMENT MISSING > >message which could distract from the true issue. Also provides better >documentation in JES2 where the member is coming from.
OTOH, that means that you do not use the system PARMLIB concatenation for your JES2 parameters. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
