OK. Thanks. I'll give it a try as well as the IBM rexx compiuler manula(s).
Regards, ITschak ITschak Mugzach Z/OS, ISV Products and Application Security & Risk Assessments Professional On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Tony Harminc <t...@harminc.net> wrote: > On 8 September 2016 at 00:55, Itschak Mugzach <imugz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am interested in ibm's Rexx compiler eye-catcher. Can you point me to > the document that the information you mentioned described there? > > As I said, it's in the TSO/E Customization book. The edition I have > here is SA32-0976-02 z/OS V2R2 TSO/E Customization. It's in Chapter 43 > "Routines and interfaces to support a REXX compiler". > > But I don't think the exact format of the eyecatcher is documented > there or anywhere else. The Customization book is about customizing > TSO/E rather than the REXX compiler. This book is agnostic about the > compiler; you can in theory write or buy one from anywhere, and it > might have a different eyecatcher from IBM's, or none at all. For that > matter, there is nothing I can see to require that the CEXEC file must > begin with executable code. When TSO/E runs a CEXEC, it doesn't branch > to the start of the CEXEC, but rather it calls the routine whose name > is in columns 13-20. That routine invokes the CEXEC code, but that > code could be in Java bytecodes or any other scheme, as far as I can > tell. > > Tony H. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
