@Peter, thanks. > the ECB storage might not have been initialized
It typically occurs after the program has been running for some time and been through several WAIT/POST cycles. > being reported on the WAIT, not the POST. > Wanna bet? FSVO "reported" <g>. I will bet you my own z/OS license that *LE* is reporting it on the WAIT. Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter Relson Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 4:47 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Interpreting an S202-000 >The program receives an S202-0000 ABEND. Did you consider the possibility that the ECB storage might not have been initialized to 0's prior to the wait (and prior to the potential post)? And perhaps the post happened before the wait. Imagine if the ECB storage is initialized by "dirty getmain" to x'80808080'. This will appear to POST as "waiting" but will not have a valid RB address and may result in a 202 abend. >It is definitely, unquestionably being reported on the WAIT, not the POST. Wanna bet? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
