On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 13:41:20 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 17:01:43 +0000, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: > >>the requirements for APF concatenation were invented to protect the customer >> >The particular implementation protects the customer from nothing.
Of course it does. Your contention that it could be better is not evidence that the requirements for APF concatenation does not protect the customer is not accurate. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
